http://www.valawyersweekly.com/vlwblog/2007/03/30/fedex-no-substitute-for-certified-mail/ Fri, 05 Dec 2008 10:15:08 +0000 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.3.1 http://www.valawyersweekly.com/vlwblog/2007/03/30/fedex-no-substitute-for-certified-mail/#comment-3 Anonymous Mon, 02 Apr 2007 23:13:00 +0000 http://www.valawyersweekly.com/vlwblog/2007/03/30/fedex-no-substitute-for-certified-mail/#comment-3 I couldn't agree more! These rules are burdensome, to say the least. If an attorney can prove he put the document in the mail and has a receipt for same, that document should be considered timely filed.....VSC Rules are just not up to date with the speed of today's world.<br/>Anonymous I couldn’t agree more! These rules are burdensome, to say the least. If an attorney can prove he put the document in the mail and has a receipt for same, that document should be considered timely filed…..VSC Rules are just not up to date with the speed of today’s world.
Anonymous

]]> http://www.valawyersweekly.com/vlwblog/2007/03/30/fedex-no-substitute-for-certified-mail/#comment-2 Anonymous Sun, 01 Apr 2007 13:41:00 +0000 http://www.valawyersweekly.com/vlwblog/2007/03/30/fedex-no-substitute-for-certified-mail/#comment-2 Yet another example of the unyielding rules that govern Virginia Supreme Court appellate practice. Our legislature should step in and override the the existing Rules matrix for appeals that is designed purely to thwart Virginia practitioners. A starting point includes review of the much more lenient procedures that governs federal appellate procedure. Yet another example of the unyielding rules that govern Virginia Supreme Court appellate practice. Our legislature should step in and override the the existing Rules matrix for appeals that is designed purely to thwart Virginia practitioners. A starting point includes review of the much more lenient procedures that governs federal appellate procedure.

]]>