13
05
2008
Virginian-Pilot columnist Kerry Dougherty got an interesting piece out of her trip to general district court for the trial of a photographic exhibitionist. Thanks and a tip of the hat to Steve Minor for spotting this.
Comments : No Comments »
Categories : General District Court
19
09
2007
A Suffolk general district judge has delayed the verdict in an assault case after getting assurances from the defense attorney, a member of the General Assembly, that lower court judges can do so, The Virginian-Pilot reports.
Judge James A. Moore delayed judgment for a year in a case brought by a church secretary against a minister. The secretary claimed the minister, unhappy with her leaving early one day, came around her desk and choked her. Her mother, who works at the church, backed her story. The minister’s wife, also present that day, said her husband never went around the desk and didn’t touch the secretary. A total of nine witnesses appeared, including Sen. L. Louise Lucas, D-Portsmouth, who was a character witness for the defendant.
According to the account in the Pilot, Moore said “he wished the General Assembly gave lower court judges the power to delay verdicts.” Del. Kenneth Melvin, D-Portsmouth, represented the defendant. He told Moore that “judges have the power inherently” to delay verdicts.
The Virginia Court of Appeals offered a different point of view three weeks ago. In Gibson v. Commonwealth, the appeals court found that in the absence of explicit legislative authority, judges can’t defer judgment in a criminal case. In the Gibson opinion, Judge Jean Harrison Clements listed the offenses in which judgment can be deferred; assault was not on that list.
Comments : No Comments »
Categories : Deferred Judgment, General District Court, Suffolk
24
07
2007
Henrico General District Judge Archer L. Yeatts III today rejected an attempt to challenge Virginia’s new scheme of “abusive driver” fees, according to the Richmond Times-Dispatch.
Yeatts ruled that a general district court didn’t have the jurisdiction to stop the fees, which took effect July 1 and establish harsher financial penalty for certain traffic offenses.
Richmond lawyers Craig Cooley and Esther Windmueller, who put together the challenge, said they would make their motions in circuit court later this week.
Comments : No Comments »
Categories : Civil Remedial Fees, General District Court